Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edulanka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edulanka[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is about a non-notable website in Sri Lanka which is not even a government one. It clearly apparent that this page has been created to promote this website as the references used in this page are not independent sources but links only related to this website. There are a large number of similar websites in Sri Lanka which have higher website ranking than this. What is the notability and encyclopedic value of keeping a Wikipedia page for this site? L Manju (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NORG is almost entirely dependent upon primary sources - concur with nom, this appears to be a self promotion by someone associated with the provider. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing to satisfy WP:NORG notability. Per WP:ORGCRIT I cannot locate significant coverage that is independent of the article subject, reliable, and a secondary source. Does not appear to exist and so this article should be deleted Such-change47 (talk) 08:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.