Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educational internet advertising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Educational internet advertising[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable neologism, primarily used by one company, whose press release is the sole cited reference. PRODed by me (as an IP), and prod removed by article creator. This is a recently created article, but a Google search reveals no helpful references or information to expand or improve this article, or demonstrate notability of the term. Most Google hits are to uses that do not match the sense in this article, which seems to confirm that this sense is not notable. DES ^(talk) 18:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theserialcomma (talk • contribs) 13:47, 15 December 2009
delete per nom ErikHaugen (talk) 19:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a notable concept, WP:NEO. --Glenfarclas (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as having no practical use. It is a very specific form of advertising, might as well be merged into Advertising or Online advertising if anyone cares. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 01:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as thinly-disguised WP:SPAM and other reasons above. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.