Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edouard Challe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is no prejudice against recreation if additional citations proving towards WP:NPROF and WP:GNG can be found. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edouard Challe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Ch1p the chop (talk) 14:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Seems like a decently well-cited scholar, but the only viable criterion seems to be WP:NPROF#C1 and I'm not sure he's quite there. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I agree with AleatoryPonderings regarding WP:PROF#C1: this is not a low-citation field and his citations are not high enough to convince me. The only other notability-relevant point I found on his cv was a new book, Macroeconomic Fluctuations and Policies (MIT Press 2019) but Google Scholar shows only one citation for it, I did not find any reviews, and as a single book it wouldn't be enough to confer WP:AUTHOR notability on its author. Probably WP:TOOSOON; it looks like the kind of case where if we come back in a few years notability will be more apparent. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per David. Almost there, but not quite, imo. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.