Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmundo Cranwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edmundo Cranwell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article appears to have emigrated to Argentina, married, opened a pharmacy, had children, and died. No claim to notability apparent. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 08:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm happy to be convinced that Argentina's pharmacies are sufficiently notable that their proprietors merit articles. Absent that, I'm in agreement with the nomination here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lots of sources seem to argue his historical importance as a pioneering businessman/pharmacist: see the references in the article. Shops or shopkeepers can be notable by WP:GNG if they're written about. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Lack of in-depth secondary sources. I tried to keep my mind open to his notability, but when the article said he opened "one of the first" pharmacies in his city rather than the "first pharmacy" my hopes for the notability of Edmundo Cranwell were dashed. He appears to not even be a pioneer in this matter. Who was the second person to climb Mount Everest? Don't know? You're not alone! Knox490 (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete what an odd article. Somebody put time into this, but this person fails GNG. Jytdog (talk) 04:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.