The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTE, no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Pollytyred (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Technical delete per nom, but a case can be made for notability based on the last external link. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
