Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Housing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eden Housing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, nothing significant in coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing significant about them. Fails WP:NCORP. Ajf773 (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it has remained the subject of discussion in reliable sources. Currently, it is written in non-encyclopaedic tone, which needs to be emended per WP:ATD. samee ^talk 16:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources? Where? Ajf773 (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google is your friend, and there would be plenty of offline and Urdu sources too. samee ^talk 13:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the article kept it's down to you to present the sources, not tell other people to google for them. SpinningSpark 02:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Samee. You are capable of using Google too, you know. Ajf773 (talk) 21:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I tried using our googly friend but a search returned mostly promotional material and primary-related sources. Something that, in fact, makes a article on the subject even less worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. SpinningSpark 02:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. The only notable aspect of that text is the polemic tone (e.g. "Because of high profile relatives and a strong background people are unable to get possession of their plots and also they are not able to get their money back. EDEN Housing is now a notorious name in the market and people are not trusting this housing anymore"), all unsourced of course. -The Gnome (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.