Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edel Creely
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Edel Creely[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edel Creely (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like yet another one of those self-promotional PR spam posts of non-encyclopedic interest. Trilogy Technologies also does not have its own article yet. A Google search turns up non-primary corporate puff pieces about how this person has been climbing the corporate ladder. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Author seems to be writing corporate puff pieces - see Draft:Elizabeth Donnelly. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Creely is the president of Ibec and is on the board of the Marie Keating Foundation. Notable or not? — Sagotreespirit (talk) 18:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well, not one of the other 16 Ibec board members (many working as CEOs of much larger businesses than her own) merits an article, and no board members are mentioned by name on the Marie Keating Foundation article at all, so... not? BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Appears to be a puff piece. Spleodrach (talk) 12:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.