Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie LeBec
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Eddie LeBec[edit]
- Eddie LeBec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable character, was only ever a minor recurring role on the show and appeared in a handful of episodes. Possibly redirect? Not really sure if it is a notable search term. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Carla Tortelli he primarily is related to her and there should be a small short on him in relationship to her. Otherwise the article isn't indipendently notable, Sadads (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Or for that matter, maybe it should be merged to List of recurring Cheers characters, Sadads (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List_of_recurring_Cheers_characters, which has a section, but zero info on him. He may not have sufficient notability for a stand-alone article, but a mention in the Cheers LoC doesn't hurt. – sgeureka t•c 06:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Either of those would be fine alternatives. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge somewhere; either of the two above suggestions would be suitable. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.