Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Gilbert Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Gilbert Tower[edit]

There is not enough content to identify the subject. The article specifies that this tower hasn't been designed yet. It does not tell us anything about the tower(s). It fails notability and looking on Google I could not find any sources that covered the subject. Nominating here because speedy delete tag was removed saying there was enough information to identify the subject of the article. A new name 2008 (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW I removed the speedy delete tag placed by A new name 2008 upon the article. However, I believe the article should be deleted, because I have found no proof that a tower called "Ed Gilbert Tower" is being planned for construction at all, from a reliable source or otherwise. I have employed SNOW, because I believe that this article is an obvious case for deletion. Terrakyte (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Too short to identify subject properly, no references, nothing shows up with Google. Basically, per the above. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 21:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No information, does not meet basic WP:NOTE and Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks) guidelines. It would also classify as a WP:CRYSTAL case, since there is no real information provided. Charles D. Ward (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The speedy call was the right one. There is not sufficient information about the structure. All of the reasons provided by Charles D. Ward apply. - Mgm|^(talk) 23:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Also fails WP:V. This is a building that hasn't even been designed yet. No location is given. Nothing to indicate that the tower project is real, never mind likely to get built. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a probable violation of WP:BLP. The author is not doing a favor for either of the two persons mentioned in the article. I cannot imagine that either of the two would make an article like this. The article is analogous to a drawing on a cocktail napkin, not a blueprint. Unfortunately, by throwing a person's name in the title, the author has compounded any problems. Mandsford (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of context and sources. An article about a building which has apparently not yet even been designed, and doesn't say where it is supposed to be built, is not what we are looking for. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This thread is about 20 times as long as the article. --Lockley (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.