Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Crewson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Crewson[edit]

Ed Crewson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Political candidate is not notable as per WP:NPOL. FUNgus guy (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • As always, unelected candidates in forthcoming elections do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot make and properly source a credible claim that he was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article before becoming a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. But being mayor of a town of 7K is not enough to demonstrate that he was already eligible for an article, either. Delete, without prejudice against recreation on October 19 if he wins. Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, subjects claim of notability as an unelected federal candidate and the mayor of a small town is not enough to warrant an article at this point in time. If he's elected on October 19, then like all other elected MPs, he would meet notability requirements and an article can be re-added at that time. Cmr08 (talk) 00:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.