Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed, Edd, n Eddy's Big Picture Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g3, blatant hoax/vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd, n Eddy's Big Picture Show[edit]

This has been an "upcoming" movie since 2007. For references, please refer to the latest incarnation, which was AFDed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed, Edd n Eddy's 1st Movie. Because of the different name, I'm not sure if it can be sent under WP:CSD#G4. There is also the deletion log of CSD candidates for this article Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Iowateen (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BALLS. JBsupreme (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G3 per WP:HOAX. The linked article is nothing more than an announcement that there will not be a sixth season of EE&E with no mention of the movie. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for a number of reasons. Even if it is real, it ain't notable. — Jake Wartenberg // ER 21:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G3 and salt, blatant misinformation. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then salt It has been (speedy) deleted many times before; I think salting would be good here. Also WP:CRYSTAL. Acebulf (talk) 23:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt It's a hoax. Chidren's cartoons never get any attention at ComicCon and with the end of Foster's on Sunday and the network's new direction away from strict animation, it's clear that CN has no interest in continuing to promote older shows like this, especially in movie form. Nate • (chatter) 23:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 02:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.