Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecoplay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoplay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. No notable independent sources could be located online, both in English and Dutch, besides press releases, blog posts and forum posts. Article does not assert notability in any significant way; an award by a organization that itself is non-notable is obviously not enough. Zero news results in English and Dutch. Unless further independent reliable sources are found that establish notabilty, this article should be deleted. Richard Ye^talk 21:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 05:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Aside from routine trademark announcements, a Highbeam search turned up an item of local Doncaster press coverage verifying the 2007 award, though linking a firm called Polypipe Sanitary Systems ([1], via Highbeam, subscription required), but without evidence that this is a notable award and further/wider coverage, I don't see enough for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. no claim or evidence of notability.--Animalparty-- (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.