Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Econsult Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 02:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Econsult Solutions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. The author said so himself: The projects are widely covered in the media and in testimony but nothing exist about the company itself. Notability is not inherited. There are also WP:SPAM issues, claims such as "ranking as the most utilized and quoted expertise for both the Public and Private Sector conducting economic impact studies in the Philadelphia Metropolitan Area" are not supported by the given source. Huon (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree per nom, Delete. I removed the G11 tag only because I didn't think it was over the top promotional. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable: Lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. We might want to know about the company, but Wikipedia needs sources providing substantial coverage. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article from Philadelphia Business Journal in 2010 relates to an initiative by the parent company rather than the subject of this article which commenced in 2013. There is more to be found on the parent company, albeit mainly Philadelphia local media, but I am finding nothing on Econsult Solutions itself. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss The most media quoted company in Philadelphia on economic impacts by the media of parent company for over thirty years on various issues and reports produced by Parent Company. How different is the Parent Company from this subdivision created is an issue for review, as there may be no difference in a historical timeline of legacy. The recent public edit using the website as a prime reference seems not to be an improvement, but a continued discussion on firms like similar Wiki pages for Nera Consulting NYC and Bain & Company Boston can be used in the discussions. Thinking out loud. Pretzelfactory (talk) 22:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.