Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economisation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Economisation[edit]

Apparently original research, nothing like the usual definition. User has some history of promoting protologisms. Just zis Guy you know? 22:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. Feezo (Talk) 22:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. It actually says This concept is theoretical at best. Plus it's POV since economic issues are the traditional political/military considerations. Peter Grey 04:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what is at best a protoogism but is more likely to be nonsense MLA 11:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.