Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecoblogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoblogs[edit]

Was de-proded by author, who runs the website. 32 unique Ghits. See WP:WEB, WP:VAIN. Delete unless notability established. GTBacchus^(talk) 01:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN --Tbeatty 02:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Angr (talk • contribs) 17:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. if it looks like blogspam, smells like blogspam... Nortelrye 22:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What's wrong with this page? It's just explaining what Ecoblogs is about. Abhinay.mehta 19:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does it meet the criteria spelled out at WP:WEB? GTBacchus^(talk) 19:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ok it doesn't. I do apologise for not reading the requirements thoroughly before creating the page. I will wait until one of those criteria are met in order to re-add the page. Abhinay.mehta 08:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.