Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eclectic tonology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eclectic tonology[edit]

WP:ESSAY, possible neologism. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 12:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being both a neologism that I can't find any sources for, and for needing a fundamental re-write. Hairhorn (talk) 12:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 12:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; non-notable neologism and original research. The paragraph is our friend. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't consider myself qualified to vote, but an article on some subject should define the the subject before anything else. Pol098 (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.