Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echostage (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 11:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Echostage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not seeing enough refs to verify notability. Last nomination for deletion [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for flagging - it's my first new page - I've updated the page with three additional references. Please let me know if you have other issues. matt.r.eldridge (talk · contribs · email) 16:30 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 18:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, DC-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 18:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Venues of this size are usually notable. Yjr sourcing is still a little weak, but I'd be surprised if it isn't possible to find better. DGG ( talk ) 18:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reluctantly. This place seems like it ought to be notable. There is one reference with significant coverage from a Reliable Source - the Washington Post - about its opening. But one Reliable Source is not enough to meet WP:GNG, and I couldn't find any others in a search. --MelanieN (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.