Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy On Hold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Very little participation. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Easy On Hold[edit]

Easy On Hold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTADVERTISING , WP:SOAP, WP:NOTSOAPBOX , WP:LINKFARM , WP:NOTOPINION , WP:PROMOTION , WP:NOTADVOCATE

This page is a promotion of the company Easy On Hold as can be seen in the first paragraph of the page...

"Easy On Hold is a music on hold and messages on hold provider owned by TBA, Inc., a Michigan, USA corporation. Notable for its successful development of streaming music on hold, Easy On Hold was founded in 1997 by Timothy Brown. The company has introduced innovations in message on hold delivery, specifically client-controlled marketing content via http stream." 

The page then skips to multiple topics each a service offered by Easy On Hold. All the sections on this page relate to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_on_hold page.

The section of "Streaming Equipment" continues to promote, both the company Easy On Hold and the manufacturer that provides their equipment- ProDigital Manufacturing. The company name ProDigital Manufacturing then includes a link directly to the equipment as if it were a direct advertisement.

The Easy On Hold page then goes as far, as to mention each service that they offer and the "notable clientele."

The References used even DIRECTLY quote the CEO of Easy On Hold These are not a neutral references. This whole page is acting as an advertisement and soapbox for Easy On Hold. In fact one of the references used is even to the Easy On Hold website... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonnn09 (talkcontribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.