Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyTasks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
EasyTasks[edit]
- EasyTasks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable real-time operating system (RTOS). The article is unreferenced. Using +EasyTask as the query to avoid results containing easy task or easy tasks, Google News returns no results. Using the same query, Google Books returns four results, all of which are irrelevant as they are Wikipedia mirrors; and Google Scholar returns eight, none relevant since they refer to other things called EasyTasks. Using +EasyTask "operating system" OR OS OR RTOS -app -Wiki -Wikipedia -site:conectaip.es -site:easytasks.es as the query, Google Web returns 129 results. The query omits results containing app since there is an unrelated iPhone app with the same name, and results from two vendor websites. There are actually 70 results that Google deems to be relevant. Nevertheless, I looked at the address and sample text of each of the 129 results to determine if any were reliable sources capable of evidencing notability. There were none. The majority are related to business activities; either selling or supporting the EasyTasks product. Rilak (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. OSborn arfcontribs. 05:12, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unreferenced, no indication of notability. Dialectric (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.