Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyCHAID

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EasyCHAID[edit]

EasyCHAID (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded by the article's creator without rationale. But prodding reason still holds true: Wholly unreferenced article about an app with no indication of notability, although it does exist. Onel5969 TT me 00:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and SALT Doing a little digging, website has the name Rafael R. Troiani listed as the author, author of the article is Rafael Rodrigues Troiani. The website links back to the wikipedia page, seemingly to give the product credibility. Delete per WP:ADMASK. Salt to prevent re-creating of advertisement. Fbifriday (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Aside from the possible COI issue discussed above, my searches are finding nothing to indicate possible notability for this site. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delte, no indication of any notability, not to mention the COI stuff. ♠PMC(talk) 16:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.