Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Side Tower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  13:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

East Side Tower[edit]

East Side Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable speculation about a prospective building. Prod declined for no real reason, my elaboration on Talk was met with no real interest. When and if this building becomes reality, it can have an article, but right now it's a simple violation of WP:CBALL. BTW that image is probably illegal on Commons, too... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete Build it first, or at least dig a hole in the ground. I've tagged the image as an obvious copyvio. Mangoe (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, clear case of WP:CRYSTAL. Timbouctou (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there are few plans to even build it, much less a foundation. Epicgenius (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.