Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Pennine Orienteering Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as advertising. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

East Pennine Orienteering Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious blatant advertising is obvious. ☆Pickbothmanlol☆ 17:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The reason given by the nominator is not a reason for deletion. It might well be advertising. The question is whether there are sources that can be used to justify notability and convert this to an article that is not advertising. Is it notable? It gets a lot of google hits that show that it is mentioned frequently by other parts of the orienteering community in the UK. It also gets some newspaper mentions, but I am not sure whether they are notable. A successful orienteering club could well be notable. Maybe this article just needs work by someone who knows more about orienteering than I do. --Bduke (Discussion) 03:26, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.