Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East India Natural Goods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

East India Natural Goods[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Easily speedy and PROD material with its current state and my searches simply found nothing better than this (passing mention only about founder, not even about the company), this and this. It's also worth noting it seems the company may've started this in July 2009 and it simply hasn't changed since then. Pinging taggers Dialectric and Calaka. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Seems no significance.--Human3015^TALK 23:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails CSD A7 and/or WP:GNG. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with above, I tried doing a google search and all the links are lists upon lists/machine generated and nothing of actual substance. Company is real and exists but unless the article creator can find sources to signify its notability soon, I would say it is safe to delete.Calaka (talk) 08:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.