Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Hastings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to F♯A♯∞. Content can be merged at editorial discretion. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 12:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
East Hastings[edit]
- East Hastings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Stub status, WP:OR ("Arguably their most iconic track..."), I see no significant coverage of the song via a Google search to warrant a redirect to F♯A♯∞. The sole reference can be integrated into that article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if this is deleted or merged, a dab page should replace it. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect - I agree completely with the nominator, especially the recommendation to add the one reference and its text to the parent album article. But the ultimate result for procedural reasons should be merge/redirect rather than a straight delete. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 22:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect - has claims of notability, but lacking in any evidence thereof. Bearian (talk) 01:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.