Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Hampton Hospital Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Green Wing. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

East Hampton Hospital Trust[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete this fictional location that fails the WP:GNG with a lack of multiple, independent WP:RS. WossOccurring (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Dalejenkins. Fences&Windows 00:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Merge to Green Wing. It is possible to find sources for this and I have added one. I favour merger in this case pending the discovery of more good sources but, in any case, deletion is inappropriate as the title is a useful search term. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - At worst merge to Green Wing. Perhaps it's a search term, but there's nothing notable about the individual article. Shadowjams (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Green Wing. Again, not enough notability/info to justify a separate article. Mangoe (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.