Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Asian New Year

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 19:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

East Asian New Year[edit]

East Asian New Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term East Asian New Year is original research by the editor, and redundant with Lunar New Year. This article falsifies a singular cultural entity, which in reality consists of culturally disparate New Year celebrations. This article mainly describes the Chinese New Year, and gives misconceptions of other New Year celebrations with over-generalization. Cydevil38 (talk) 01:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. Per nom. We already have Chinese New Year which is on not just the holiday in China but the globally celebrated holiday, including in the rest of East Asia. In some cases there are articles for specific countries such as Korean New Year. But there's no need for a separate article on the holiday in 'East Asia', that's already covered in Chinese New Year.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 19:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.