Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:NOTAGAIN. Nominated last year twice. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Earth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please be aware that the world will end tomorrow. BTW, it is April 1. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 01:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Harmless. StAnselm (talk) 01:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ...mostly. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 05:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If we delete articles on dead planets, we'll also need to remove all the biographies of dead people. Seriously, though, I'm not sure this kind of mock-deletion is funny 4th time around. -- Radagast3 (talk) 01:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. The article is a mess, it says the Earth is 4 billion years old, says it is a sphere, and that humans are a cosmopolitan species. I call BS. — CIS ^(talk | stalk) 01:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All no, not all the "earth articles". i mean delete all articles. reality is a barely held together consensual hallucination, the word "is" as an equality between a logographic idea and any other collection of logographic ideas is (the one time you can use this word) meaningless. open mouth, already a mistake. time to rake the leaves, watch the sun set.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep It clearly exists, nothing else matters. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! –WikiDalek 01:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into 42. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 01:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidalek has it wrong. We should not be EX-TER-MI-NATEing this article. This article should be DELETED.Umbralcorax (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE and EX-TER-MI-NATE there problem solved=)Sign My Guestbook! User:Sumsum2010 03:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Something something something, you would destroy with just four daleks? Umbralcorax (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Didn't you see Doomsday? There was a Genesis Ark that contained millions of them. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deep fry A planet filled with idiots that nobody cares. But I hear that it's juicy, so let's have it for lunch. Blodance the Seeker 03:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
comment- oh, and has anyone else noticed, ALL the references are from inhabitants of the planet. Can we say obvious conflict of interest?Umbralcorax (talk) 03:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then, let's look for Martians who could write this article for us. Alexius08 (talk) 04:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CommentIsn't this just the UK term for Ground and neutral? And yes, some references from reliable sources outside the subject locality would help in demonstrating notability. This is a step in the right direction, but some would call it a passing reference. Edison (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If it's been nominated four times it's obviously not notable. Let's just blow it up already. Reach Out to the Truth 04:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Might as well beat Al Gore to the punch. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Moon. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Save our Earth ! Kenrick Talk 05:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
peeK the Eart will last tow moer yaers at leest! Didnt yu watkh tuh movee? 76.66.192.73 (talk) 06:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've grown accustom to it CTJF83 chat 06:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, Merge to Sun per Homer Simpson "The sun? That's the hottest place on earth." (THOH X) CTJF83 chat 07:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, improper listing; AFD header is missing from the article. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Save... the planet! Valley2city^‽ 07:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or else I'd be unable to fulfill my election promises. Olaf Davis (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and run a checkuser on all the keep !votes - I'm rather suspicious that some of them may have an undeclared COI and will turn out to be from that rather average (gravity = 1, orbital rotation = 1) planet. WereSpielChequers : Chat 08:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The earth is not going to blow up...or is it? NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 12:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mostly harmless ~~planet~~ article. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to humorless administrator. Last April 1, the nomination of Earth was the April Fool's Day joke, so "I've heard this one". Mandsford (talk) 13:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.