Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earstroke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Earstroke[edit]

Not notable online reocrd label/store/download site with 254 Unique Google hits. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nondescript two-year-old label in an article that doesn't bother to identify a single act signed to it. When/if it becomes more significant, a substantive article could be written for it... but not now, apparently. B.Wind 00:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep expand rather than delete? Lugnuts 17:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- On what basis? What sources are there that demonstrate that Earstroke satisfies either WP:CORP or WP:MUSIC? I've seen none so far. If it were a notable record/CD label, notable acts on it would have been identified by now. So far.... nada. B.Wind 22:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence has been presented to support notability. Simply existing and being in a particular business is not per se notable. WMMartin 15:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.