Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Video Productions Inc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Eagle Video Productions Inc[edit]
- Eagle Video Productions Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no significant coverage for this video production company. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Nom. this is a vanity page, no coverage, no refs.Newmanoconnor (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong| confabulate _ 22:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage from established reliable sources = deletion time. Nyttend (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NCORP, WP:PROMO. I found nothing either. -- Trevj (talk) 13:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.