Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle LA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Eagle LA[edit]
- Eagle LA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - lack of independent secondary sources that indicate notability. Fails WP:GNG. Listed "sources" are not independent of the bar or are about various DJs who play there and so do not establish notability. Personally I find this to be WP:SPAM but speedy was declined based on the two-sentence "history" of the bar. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete I put it to weak per the LA Times link. Otherwise, I agree with Cow. Doc Quintana (talk) 22:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The LA Times link is simply an entry on a bar guide, like any other bar or restaurant in the city might get. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 22:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's still something from a reliable source. Most articles at AFD don't have even that. Doc Quintana (talk) 03:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was hoping more references would turn up, but even after spending some time, I couldn't find much mention, even in borderline sources like guidebooks. tedder (talk) 04:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.