Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EWMG
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
EWMG[edit]
Unremarkable unused vanity protologism. EWMG, let's nix this. Adrian Lamo ·· 06:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Protologism. (Would've said "Per nom," but protologism is too fun to type.) — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) [ 22:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC) ][reply]
- Delete. "Coined by Jeremy Swinarton in 2005." Who? Exactly. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, and this reeks of that. --Kinu 06:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT, as per Kinu. (aeropagitica) 07:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Protologism, vanity, non-notable and unverifyable. --Wingsandsword 08:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 09:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity, unverifiable and protologism. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 11:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. What's next, EWMAHGAWD!!!11!1one!!1!1eleventy!!1!1?--み使い Mitsukai 15:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You forgot EWMGBBQ!!1!!1 ;)
- Strong delete EWMG, get that OUT of here. Avi 18:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Protologism ? That's made my day. Angus McLellan 20:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: And if this AfD is successful, it will undoubtedly become a paleologism. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) – 6 February 2006, 21:03 (UTC)
- Comment: you mean there's no article about Eleventyone? *shocked* . Adrian Lamo ·· 20:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually eleventy-one. --Fuhghettaboutit 00:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.