Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EUROTAI (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure)Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EUROTAI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tagged for notability for 7 years, and I still don't feel convinced it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Last AfD (2014) ended in no consensus - hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Pinging Pass a Method and Kafkasmurat who commented at last AfD. Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer Can I ask that as this has been tagged for notability for 7 years, that it is relisted again (if no clear consensus has emerged) rather than close as no consensus based mainly on poor participation? Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've just copyedited and expanded the article with rel refs to an acceptable level. Pls recheck. --CeeGee 19:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn per above, Boleyn (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.