Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMMA for Peace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 14:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EMMA for Peace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems a very worthy organisation but has it established its notability? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paolo Petrocelli, where it is already mentioned. The founder appears to be notable; the organization does not. --MelanieN (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With significant coverage in BBC Music Magazine (see also here), the news agency ANSAmed, and the regional Italian newspaper Il Tirreno, we do seem to have "notability": Noyster (talk), 08:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - seems to be multiple, reliable sources to just clear notability.--Rpclod (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly notable. Organization is Notable enought to stick at Wiki. Paolo Petrocelli the founder of EMMA is also a Notable subject. Strong Keep! --Khocon (talk) 9:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep – Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.