Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHealthMe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ leaning keep. Daniel (talk) 00:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EHealthMe[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG ~T P W 16:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. ~T P W 16:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Websites, and Wisconsin. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I hate to do all of this relisting but I'm seeing less participation lately in AFD discussions. I don't want to close a deletion discussion based on a two word deletion rationale.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep There's this in WaPo [1], doesn't appear to be a PR piece/advertising, and these in medical journals [2], [3], [4]. Appears to be a legit medical database, used in the clinical research setting. But they are trivial mentions, so likely not at GNG. I'm thinking of the recent Law blog article also here for AfD, sources appear to be similar... What do others think? Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Scrapes it. The WPO article is SIGCOV, and the database does appear in a wide range of medical journals. The article is not offensive or overly promotional. Aszx5000 (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.