Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHS Insight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 20:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EHS Insight[edit]

EHS Insight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable software from non notable company. Every reference here is a press release or a disguised press release or a mere listing.. DGG ( talk ) 12:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 03:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article on a product. As the nomination says, the given references are not substantial independent coverage, and my searches are not locating anything beyond trademark and product listings. No evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and I wish I had commented before the relist so we could close this; there's essentially nothing basically convincing for the needed notability and substance. SwisterTwister talk 03:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- a non notable software product from a non-notable company. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.