Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDUCANG (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
EDUCANG[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- EDUCANG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable organisation now defunct no WP:RS found. Last AfD in 2006 Paul foord (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Paul foord (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Paul foord (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 25. Snotbot t • c » 00:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I tried to find sources a while ago but came up with nothing. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The activities of this entity do seem to have given rise to a notable case in terms of Australian rights concerning unfair dismissal judging from these articles from Aug 2006 & Sept 2007 (via Highbeam, sub. reqd.). However that is secondary to the subject itself about which no real evidence of notability is found. AllyD (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails even the most basic requirements for notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per above. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 18:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely fails WP:GNG. - tucoxn\talk 21:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.