Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EChip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EChip[edit]

Delete The article is written to make EChip look notable, but actually reads like an advert. No source information other than link to manufacturer's site Bugturd Talk 19:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retain On the basis that other similar articles already exist within Wikipedia! It is a first draft with other links to UK Education sites to follow showcasing the methodology of Systems design used within Electronics teaching in UK Schools.

--BPSmith 20:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment BPSmith is the author of the article in question, and has no other contribs aside from userpage. The article links to the eChip webpage, which (you guessed it) will sell you an eChip. --Bugturd Talk 21:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Johnleemk | Talk 14:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — The program looks similar in function to Microsoft Visio. Just because it is similar doesn't make it special enough to have its own article. Perhaps if there were notable accomplishments made with eChip, then the program may have an article. Kareeser|^Talk! 15:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say delete. While I appreciate Mr. Smith's efforts, this system just doesn't seem to be notable at the moment. Maybe if it ever catches on. --Optichan 20:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advert Avi 21:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:V. Stifle 19:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.