Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EC8OR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 23:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EC8OR[edit]

non-notable band akaDruid (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:MUSIC#C5 through Digital Hardcore Recordings. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 06:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Ec8or Page should not be deleted. Why in the heck would it be deleted? Ec8or are a notable and influential European electronic band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.88.101 (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They had reviews and interviews in NME. Notable.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Singu larity 17:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The group is on Yahoo [1] and they have hit a couple of minor charts and have released multipul albums etc... seems to me that they have passed WP:BAND... --Pmedema (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets criterion 5 of WP:MUSIC by having multiple recordings on evidently notable labels. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there seem to be sufficient reliable sources on which to base an article. For example this profile from PopMatters.com, these two from NME, this article in Now, also mentions in other sources such as MTV and the New York Times. Guest9999 (talk) 21:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.