Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Russell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E. Russell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Not even his first name is known. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There are alot of nominations for deletions for articles on rugby league footballers where there first name isn't known, I think they should all be nominated in the same AfD. ビッグツリ64 (talk) 21:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Block evasion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As far as I can see totally fails GNG. There might be something but I cannot find even one trivial mention in match reports. Aoziwe (talk) 11:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and also based on search results presented by Aoziwe. Cbl62 (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia requires independent sources. The website of an organization someone played for is not indepedent. Large nominations lead to true messes, there is no reason to suggest we should have done that here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG lacks independent sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.