Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. M. Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E. M. Washington[edit]

Delete seems to have a notable grandfather and had a minor mention in one article in 2004 when he was accused of making copies of his grandfather's work. Maybe worth a line on his grandfather's article but that seems to be it. Charlesknight 10:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with grandfather's article. S ug ar p in e t/c 23:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - no verifiable grandfather on whom to base an article! Bridgeplayer 02:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've seen enough work on eBay and at other auctions attributed to E.M. Washington. It's all (to the best of my ability to tell) recent work, mostly on old paper, much of it copying older prints. They're significant as forgeries. Given that there doesn't seem to be any evidence that E.M. Washington (the grandfather) was a printmaker, the article should be about the grandson or E.M. Washington as an entity. But that's just my 2 cents. cbustapeck 03:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sourced, verifiable and encyclopaedic. Oh, and interesting :-) Bridgeplayer 02:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both links to the same Forbes article; fails WP:BIO. Tewfik^Talk 19:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.