Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-diagnostics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E-diagnostics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains speculation and WP:OR. At best, right now, this term is a dictionary entry. Taroaldo (talk) 01:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree that this would be something more for Wiktionary, but I think it would fall short even there. You can't just add the letter "e" to a word and instantly make a new notable word. You can the letter "i", but only if you are Apple, Inc. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vague dicdef, no sources. Hairhorn (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. E-anything is so 1999. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Completely unsourced, and anyway would server its purpose better in Wiktionary or something. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.