Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 12:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG I can find no widespread coverage of the journal in reliable sources independent of the subject. Theroadislong (talk) 14:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Listed in Scopus, a reliable source satisfies WP:NJournals, an essay that explains why this satisfies WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see it listed at their website? [1] Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the middle of the page, "Scopus Source List". I used to link directly to that Excel file, until I noticed that the specific URL of the file changes when they update it and the old one goes dead. I don't like to put instructions in a reference ("click this or that"), and don't see a good way to cite this otherwise. I cannot link the journal page in Scopus either, as my access goes through a "gate", so that URL works only for me (most people who have access will be in a similar situation). It's clumsy, I admit... --Randykitty (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, my iMac crashed opening the document but I did see it eventually! I'll see if there is a better secondary source. Theroadislong (talk) 16:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Randykitty. Passes WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes NJOURNALS - it is in "Scopus source list" [2] ---Steve Quinn (talk) 09:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NJOURNALS and arguments above, I guess we can snow keep and close this now? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.