Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-603

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, not enough third-party coverage.--PeaceNT (talk) 13:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E-603[edit]

Nonnotable "mashup artist"; only sources are last.fm and 2 blogs (although one is the New York magazine blog, I don't think it sufficiently shows notability per WP:MUSIC). NawlinWiki (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- WilliamH (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 14:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete This artist was mentioned in an article in New York Magazine. Per the notability standard for music, a band/performer would qualify if there was an article in any medium from a reputable source that does not 1) reprint the artists material or 2)merely report who is playing. The article in New York Magazine, while small, does include legitimate editorializing from a legitimate source.
Delete per the nomination it does not meet WP:MUSIC right now. JBsupreme (talk) 03:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete per the nomination it does meet the first criterion of WP:MUSIC. The accountability of the New York Magazine's blog is not in question. Vulture is the daily culture blog of New York Magazine and, while it is an offshoot of the print magazine, it is subjected to the same standards of verification as the print. The editors are established writers published in the print magazine, Slate, The Believer, and other publications. atwardster (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.