Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynastia Miziołków

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dynastia Miziołków[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis of the information in the article in the Polish WP, of which the Google Translation is [1]. The key information is that it won the Polish award for Children's Bestseller of the Year for 1996 and another Polish prize of significance [2] for 1995. DGG ( talk ) 00:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the awards and the sources now in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment I added some more information from the Polish Wikipedia. (Phil Bridger previously added some), Quite a number of articles added from other Wikipedias are only partially entered, & there is more to be said. Here , there is additional information on the importance of the author--as well as national level prizes. I do not think it good practice to nominate a national topic for deletion when there is a corresponding topic in that language's Wikipedia without checking first. Google translate may not be good enough to produce a decently written article, but it's good enough to see roughtly what the information is. DGG ( talk ) 13:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per both the comments and additions of DGG and Phil Bridger.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.