Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic frequenzy scaling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic frequenzy scaling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Frequency is spelled wrong in the article, and one with correct spelling already exists Jeppevinkel (talk) 13:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (G7 Speedy) - So why did you create this article? I've tagged it for speedy deletion Exemplo347 (talk) 13:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A friend of mine found it funny to use my pc to make a prank Jeppevinkel (talk) 14:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.