Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Assessment for Transportation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete vanity spam Guy 11:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic Assessment for Transportation[edit]

Vanity; 4 other articles from same source also going to AfD EngineerScotty 00:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:See also AFDs for the following:

--EngineerScotty 00:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination, I wish people would stick to just creating their one line autobio vanity stub that can be speedy deleted on sight. Equendil Talk 00:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fqm6254 01:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)PLEASE do not delete this entry. It is not an autobio. It is not a vanity autobio snub. It is referenced by government publications. Please ignore EngineerScotty and Equendil. The are not qualified to make this determination and are not educated in the art germane to this information.[reply]
Moved comment above to match chronological order and restore layout. Equendil Talk 01:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
' EngineerScotty, Equendil, and Wildthing61476 are retaliating against me User:NYer for earlier complaints I made against certain Wikipedia administrators. They are attempting to delete or get others to delete my entries. Please DO NOT delete this entry. Furthermore, they are not medical doctors or biomedical engineers and this information is cited by government sources. Thank you.NYer 01:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)'[reply]

Delete with extreme prejudice, extreme vanity by someone attempting to disrupt Wikipedia for their own gain. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 02:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --physicq210 02:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Zoe. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 02:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 'Nuff said. Michael Kinyon 09:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.