Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyna Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dyna Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An earlier PROD tag was placed on the article but removed by the article's creator. Here is my initial concern:

I wish them all the best but this record label is a few weeks old and has only released music by one of its founders. Quite clearly, the label is not notable enough. In fact there's another record company with the same name that was founded in the Philippines in 1957 and is probably more notable than the Dyna Records of the present article. (see [1]) Finally (and this is just a minor point as far as deletion is concerned) the username of the creator suggests a potential conflict of interest. Pichpich (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree this is not notable enough and it's way too recent. -- Dane2007 22:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. The Banner talk 19:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.