Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DynGen Hunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DynGen Hunter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this game is notable. The links provided are to download sites (via iTunes, Google Play, etc.), a link to a gaming website that has zero content, and a forum/profile page on another similar website that does not appear to meet WP:RS. I can find no substantive third-party information about this game. Kinu ^t/_c 18:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no reliable sources (that I can find) that mention the game. If this is 'notable' surely every game ever made should have a Wikipedia page. Wrightie99 (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Can't find any reliable source coverage of this game. Sam Walton (talk) 10:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GNG - No indication why this is notable. Lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. I did a Highbeam search which gave no results. A google search did not find any reliable sources. - Taketa (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing usable in WP:VG/RS Google custom search, and only around 100 Google hits total, none of which seem to be reliable sources. Probably too soon for an article. Can be recreated later when reviews show up. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable/independent sources, not notable. Becky Sayles (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.