Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Playfair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Playfair[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of an actor, demonstrating no evidence that he passes WP:NACTOR as of yet. As always, actors are not automatically handed a free notability pass just because roles have been listed -- he needs to be the subject of reliable source coverage about him to get a Wikipedia article, but none is being shown here, and all I can find on a Google News search is glancing namechecks of his existence, not coverage that's substantively about him at all. No prejudice against recreation if and when he can be properly sourced as passing an NACTOR criterion, but right now it's WP:TOOSOON. Bearcat (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree on WP:TOOSOON. Michelle Mylett has been deleted multiple times too. sikander (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON. No sourcing = no claim to notability. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:34, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.