Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dweomer (Deverry Cycle)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dweomer (Deverry Cycle)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single-source article about structure of magic in a series of novels. Completely in-universe style, non-notable on its own. Marked for cleanup for more than six years. Mikeblas (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after transwiking to this page. Like the article for Deverry, this element just hasn't received coverage independent of the book series to where it'd merit an article. However I do note that the Wikia page for the topic is much shorter and not as in-depth, so there would be merit in sending the information over to that page where it will be more useful. (As tone and lack of sourcing is not really an issue for fan wikis.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.